maruti fronx worth mileage, Nissan Magnite AMT, consolation, efficiency – Introduction

Compact SUVs have change into the go-to vehicles for the each day metropolis grind. The compact dimension helps parking and manoeuvring, the excessive floor clearance helps navigate uprooted metropolis roads, and whereas these components make a convincing case on their very own, what takes it a notch additional is the comfort of an automated gearbox. In case you are looking out for an automated compact SUV for round Rs 10 lakh, the Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT and the Nissan Magnite AMT will undoubtedly get your consideration. However which one is healthier?

Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: design

The Magnite is taller and squarer, making it appear bigger.

When it comes to styling, each SUVs take a barely totally different method. Being based mostly on the Baleno hatchback, the Fronx doesn’t have a boxy stance, and though the cladding helps, it’s removed from trying like an SUV. The Magnite, alternatively, is taller and squarer, making it appear bigger. In dimensions, just a few millimetres separate the 2; the Fronx is barely longer, wider and has an extended wheelbase, whereas the Magnite is taller and has the next floor clearance (205mm vs 190mm). Each vehicles get LED headlamps and 16-inch alloy wheels, which is very commendable for the Fronx as it is just accessible within the Delta+ trim, not the top-spec Alpha.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: specs

Contained in the Fronx, unsurprisingly, it feels extra like a hatchback than an SUV. The sense of house isn’t all that nice, and for the reason that driver’s seat misses out on top regulate, the driving place is restricted. Nonetheless, the dashboard options a number of trims and panels that give it a contemporary really feel, and high quality is nice too. The inside of the Magnite feels extra SUV-like, the cabin is ethereal and the dashboard is about additional away which helps help the sense of house. And whereas plastics and general high quality are first rate, they’re a shade behind what you get within the Fronx.

Contained in the cabin, the Fronx feels extra like a hatchback than an SUV. 

That mentioned, you do get higher storage within the Magnite and correct bottle holders within the centre together with a centre armrest for the motive force. Storage within the Maruti is restricted to a small house below the HVAC panel, with the central cup holders being tiny. Consolation, nonetheless, is nice because of massive and accommodating seats which might be tender and supportive, whereas the Nissan has slimmer seats that aren’t as nicely cushioned; driver-seat top regulate makes up for the misplaced factors although.

Magnite’s inside high quality is a shade behind what you get within the Fronx.

The Magnite scores nicely within the rear seat too, with spectacular roominess and a flat ground that ensures even the centre passenger is snug. Nonetheless, there isn’t a headrest within the center and it solely will get a lap belt for security. Nonetheless, it does get rear AC vents, which the Fronx doesn’t. Headroom for tall passengers might be a problem within the Fronx, compounded by the tapering roofline, however legroom and kneeroom are good. The centre passenger does get their very own headrest and a three-point seat belt, but it surely’s too cramped, and three abreast won’t be snug. Boot capability within the Fronx stands at 308 litres, which is lower than the 336 litres of the Magnite.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: options

On options, the Nissan is clearly forward: a 360-degree digicam, which is a giant plus in tight areas; a 6-speaker setup for higher audio; and keyless entry and go. The touchscreen on this Fronx Delta+ is a smaller 7-inch unit in comparison with the Magnite’s 8-inch, although each get wi-fi smartphone connectivity.

The Magnite will get a 360-degree digicam, which is exclusive for this worth level.

Relating to security, each get twin airbags, however the Magnite will get TPMS and has been rated 4 stars for grownup occupant security and three stars for youngster occupant security within the outdated regime of International NCAP crash assessments. The Fronx has not been examined by International NCAP but.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: powertrain, efficiency

The Fronx AMT is over 7 seconds faster to 100kph than the Magnite.

AMT fashions are sometimes proprietor pushed, so components like efficiency and driveability do play a giant function. The Fronx will get a 1.2-litre, 4-cylinder petrol engine making 90hp, which is an entire lot greater than the 72hp from the 1.0-litre, 3-cylinder engine within the Magnite. Torque within the Fronx is healthier nonetheless, and the result’s unsurprising. In a 0-100kph sprint, the Fronx is over 7 seconds faster (13.70sec vs 20.71sec), and it’s a comparable story in relation to roll-on acceleration. The powertrain within the Magnite is simply too relaxed and a fast overtake requires lots of planning. Add to that the poor refinement, and the Magnite begins dropping out. AMTs should not anticipated to be as clean as CVTs or torque converters, however the Maruti unit is much extra refined and slicker with its shifts. Each vehicles additionally get handbook modes for the gearbox, however actually, you’ve chosen the AMT for the automated comfort, and that’s what issues.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: experience, dealing with

Experience consolation on each SUVs is nicely fitted to damaged roads, however it’s the Fronx that edges forward with a bit extra suppleness; the Magnite is a tad firmer.

Round corners, the Magnite’s tall stance ends in a little bit of physique roll, whereas the Fronx stays flat and composed. The steering of each SUVs is gentle and manoeuvrability is easy, though they’ll solely be adjusted for rake and never attain. 

Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: verdict

Each SUVs have their strengths, and on paper at the least, it might appear the Magnite comes out on prime. It’s the extra sensible selection, with extra inside and boot house, taller dimensions and better floor clearance. And with much more options at a lower cost, it’s higher worth for cash too. Nonetheless, its sluggish and clunky powertrain is just too a lot of a compromise in a automotive that may primarily be proprietor pushed. The Fronx alternatively, is powered by Maruti’s confirmed and common 1.2 Ok-Sequence engine, mated to a a lot better developed AMT, and also you’ll be happier behind its wheel. And whereas the Delta+ trim misses out on a few of the Magnite’s frills, it has the fundamentals coated. In the end, whereas the Nissan checks extra packing containers, it’s the better-rounded Maruti that we might advocate.

Additionally see:

Maruti Suzuki Fronx long run evaluation, 5,000km report

Nissan Magnite AMT evaluation: Performs the worth card

Nissan Magnite AMT vs Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT comparability video