Quote:
I am undecided you’d name the iX a correctly designed EV. No maximization of area, only a large home with small inside.
They need to have skipped the iX and simply offered a Full EV G05 X5! The mannequin lineup would seem like this:
X5 40i (…ICE as we all know it)
X5 45e (present PHEV as we all know it)
X5 50e (present PHEV as we all know it)
X5 M50i (present ICE as we all know it)
X5 M60i (present ICE as we all know it)
X5 M55ie (new Full BEV Mannequin,…Twin Motors)
X5 M60ie (new Full BEV mannequin,…Twin Motors and extra energy)
X5 M70ie (new Full BEV mannequin,…Tri-Motors,…with loopy energy! There could be 1 motor up Entrance and two motors within the Rear.
That is what BMW ought to have executed! Nobody requested for an iX mannequin. BMW has to realized that their loyal prospects need their BMW to seem like a BMW at first vs some new look they don’t seem to be accustomed to.
Simply think about the $million$ in R&D spent on the iX,..that might have been allotted to the X5 and X7 chassis! Additionally, talking of the X7, I could as effectively add what the X7 lineup would seem like to this publish:
X7 40i (present ICE as we all know it)
X7 45e (new PHEV mannequin)
X7 50e (new PHEV mannequin)
X7 M50i (present ICE as we all know it)
X7 M60i (present ICE as we all know it)
X7 M55ie (new Full BEV Mannequin,…Twin Motors)
X7 M60ie (new Full BEV mannequin,…Twin Motors and extra energy)
X7 M70ie (new Full BEV mannequin,…Tri-Motors,…with loopy energy!) There could be 1 motor up Entrance and two motors within the Rear.
The above Fashions would have be fairly simple for BMW to design,…engineer and market!
Word to BMW,…You are Welcome!
