The reason it needs so much torque is because of the large diameter of the bolt. The large diameter of the bolt creates more friction than a smaller diameter one, and therefore requires more torque to get the same clamping pressure as smaller one.
7250 is a bit low for Such a hustle but then again everything in that time is overengineered to the next level becouse faliure point simulation wasn't invented yet and testing Such things is expensive af.
SVT Zetec – 74nm, 90° angle torque, go make 7300 ripums. I4's have some half order, significant first, second, and third order harmonics. The BMW method seems a bit excessive.
Make no sense because in-line 6 are the most harmonic balance engines secondary force cánseles out after every rotación which mean that it’s the most smooth engine that will prevent crank pulley to loosen out.
The engineers gave it some thought. Did you hear yourself say that. There are probably a dozen ways to get around that problem without making sure the owner will never be able to work on it. It was about dealer servicing.
I did that and unlocked a secret stage in ColinMcrae on ps2.
It's because they would rather punish the techs than balance the motor to a higher standard.
😂😂😂 try torquing a sealed hub bearing on a mack mru between 670 and 880 ft lbs. You weakling car guys make me laugh
S65 8250rpm and doesn’t need a crank bolt that tight.
Material hardness 12.9
Also they could try to balance the engine a bit better (rly low red line tbh) and try lighter pulley
Then what its for the e60m5 5lv10 reving to 8250
Lol acting like 7krpm is a big deal
Kamax Bolt 👀
The reason it needs so much torque is because of the large diameter of the bolt. The large diameter of the bolt creates more friction than a smaller diameter one, and therefore requires more torque to get the same clamping pressure as smaller one.
Lock tite
Honda engineers be like 😅😅😅
Awesome!
7250 is a bit low for Such a hustle but then again everything in that time is overengineered to the next level becouse faliure point simulation wasn't invented yet and testing Such things is expensive af.
I just hold the uggaduggas down for a few seconds and she’s good to go
SVT Zetec – 74nm, 90° angle torque, go make 7300 ripums. I4's have some half order, significant first, second, and third order harmonics. The BMW method seems a bit excessive.
That bolt is holding the w(hole) BMW together…
A little loctite could have avoided all that
Yeah try the n52-54 … 100nm and 270-360 degrees… if you dont do it in the car good luck trying to do it in the stand Lol 😂😂😂
Make no sense because in-line 6 are the most harmonic balance engines secondary force cánseles out after every rotación which mean that it’s the most smooth engine that will prevent crank pulley to loosen out.
The engineers gave it some thought. Did you hear yourself say that. There are probably a dozen ways to get around that problem without making sure the owner will never be able to work on it. It was about dealer servicing.
I don’t know where you got 538. When you’re staring at about 110.6 ft lbs
Because it's shit
Ford cam phasers have a stupid torque sequence also